home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
TIME: Almanac 1995
/
TIME Almanac 1995.iso
/
time
/
120390
/
1203472.000
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1993-04-15
|
3KB
|
70 lines
<text id=90TT3248>
<title>
Dec. 03, 1990: Hot Red
</title>
<history>
TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1990
Dec. 03, 1990 The Lady Bows Out
</history>
<article>
<source>Time Magazine</source>
<hdr>
BOOKS, Page 120
Hot Red
</hdr>
<body>
<qt>
<l>THE MAN WHO CHANGED THE WORLD: THE LIVES OF MIKHAIL S. GORBACHEV </l>
<l>by Gail Sheehy </l>
<l>HarperCollins; 416 pages; $22.95</l>
</qt>
<p> If it is not an old Russian proverb, it should be: When
skating on thin ice, move quickly. Like Gail Sheehy, who has
learned some fast footwork and slick maneuvers during her career
as a New Journalist and pop psychologist. Her biography of the
Soviet leader marks Sheehy's debut as a pop political scientist.
</p>
<p> Sheehy has the sort of drive and self-confidence that must
have impressed her gloomy Soviet hosts. Like a laptop Barbara
Walters, she attempts to bag "top" officials, those with
"ultimate power." But the Big Guy won't show, and the Kremlin's
First Lady, says Sheehy, "has never consented to an interview."
</p>
<p> This statement is followed by a thorough clawing. Raisa
Gorbachev is "a cultural and intellectual snob." She is tactless
abroad and a hypocrite at home. "Despite all her moralistic
lectures," writes Sheehy, "Raisa is known for doing very little
to alleviate the cruel conditions that dictate the lives of most
of her countrywomen."
</p>
<p> Gorbachev comes across as a brilliant bumpkin from cossack
country who could not have made it without Raisa, a doctor of
Marxist theory and, in the Sheehy version, the real "prophet of
perestroika." How two devout party members could have climbed
to the top of the Communist apparatus while nurturing heretical
ideas is the subject that gives the author her central thesis
of how Gorbachev operates.
</p>
<p> He is, like Soviet leaders before him, a master of
doublethink. Sheehy eventually turns this standard Orwellian
idea into what she calls her own "shattering insight...There
is no bottom line to the Soviet socialist ideal--it's a snake
pit of hypocrisy."
</p>
<p> If the scales do not exactly fall from the reader's eyes, it
is because Sheehy does little to distinguish between what is
banal and what is distinctive in her findings and her arguments.
There are also problems that undermine reader confidence. Early
on Sheehy writes, "Did Gorbachev change the world or did the
world change him? I took as my premise the second
interpretation." So how come the title of her breathless book
is The Man Who Changed the World?
</p>
<p>By R.Z. Sheppard.
</p>
</body>
</article>
</text>